I wonder about the experience of the user. Do they get colour vision? What are they seeing? How high res is the sensor?
…as opposed to vision loss due to closing them? Or being in a dark room?
For the rest of your life, you’ll have to live with everybody you talk to suddenly noticing your weird eye, and becoming focused on it, despite trying not to. Learn hypnosis, make them your slave.
The European Union and Europe are not the same thing.
Just like America and the USA are not the same thing.
Technically correct and relevant are not the same thing.
America is a continent. United States OF America is an unoriginal country name.
Exactly!
The European Economic Area and the European Union are not the same thing.
Correct! Neither is the EFTA zone and the Schengen zone
Technically correct, but in everyday conversation most people will get what you mean anyway I think.
I don’t really know, without reading the article, what they mean by “Europe.”
What other entity in Europe could collectively decide to approve something? I mean, it’s not 100% ambiguous, but I think it’s pretty safe guess.
I dunno. I’m not European, but my first guess would be it’s some organization under the EU? But then that wouldn’t include all countries in Europe.
To be fair, the EU doesn’t include all countries in Europe. But honestly, if you hear that “Europe” does something, do you really think that this doesn’t mean the EU?
If someone referenced “America” to me, I’d assume they meant the US and not go “Well, akchually…”
Why speak incorrectly when we can just speak correctly? Words have meanings.
When you’re near the coast and someone points and says “Hey, look at that big boat”, do you also feel the need to point out that the vessel in question is actually a ship since it’s gross tonnage is actually above 500?
Sure, words have meanings, but you can also be a little lenient in everyday conversation. You get what they’re saying, don’t you?
If there is only one vessel, there is no need to disambiguate - the person adressed by the statement cannot misunderstand it.
If there are two vessels in the area pointed at, one large and one small, yes I will say ship for the large one and boat for the small one.
So if there were two vessels and someone said “Look at that big boat”, you’d assume they meant the smaller one because the other was a ship?
Likewise, if someone said “America has a gun problem”, you’re going to assume they mean every single country in both north and south America as a collective?
Seriously?
No, I won’t assume, I will ask a clarifying question
They had something like these in the US like ten years ago but the company(companies?) that made them went under and the people who got them lost their vision again as the bionic eyes degraded and couldn’t be repaired. Giving sight to the blind was not profitable, I guess.
It’s because it was one time payment and not subscription. This or they should figure out how to insert some ads in there.
(yes, it’s like in Black Mirror).
Becoming Repomen will be a valid Job Option
Where can I apply?
If it was a one time payment, they wouldn’t need replacements.
one time payment and thrn repairs when it breaks, like a car or house.
That’s very interesting. Can you provide any sources for that, please?
https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete There’s a bunch of other articles if you search for “bionic eye obsolete” or similar stuff. Turns out we had them more like 20 years ago.
How is this related to this company?
They produce(d) very similar products; bionic eyes. The situations are pretty directly comparable.
;)
I almost never have tears in my eyes but this has done it
Well done, good luck and may competition follow closely
I think collaboration would better than the competition.
If competition was better than collaboration. Every single company would be a 1 man operation.
The device is a long way from restoring normal vision. The images it produces are black and white and the field of vision is extremely narrow. Hodak described the experience to the Financial Times as “kind of like looking through a straw in the center of their vision,” though he added that they see a pathway to color vision and higher acuity.
Unless they can backport the future improvements somehow, I’d wait as long as possible before jumping on it with those limitations.
I mean, if you are blind and have normal European healthcare, you can have a dozen eye operations to replace with different versions. What is the worst that can happen, you go blind? /s
You can remove the “/s”
Compared to beeing completly blind?
They should make an implant that communicates directly with the optic nerve. Because retinal implants only work when there is still a potentially functioning retina that can be stimulated in the first place.
Retina does a lot of image processing which we almost certainly don’t understand. Unless we can simulate it somehow, it probably wouldn’t help.
More than five million people worldwide suffer from geographic atrophy, the late stage of the progressive eye condition dry age-related macular degeneration. The disease destroys the photoreceptors at the center of the retina, known as the macula, which is responsible for the sharp central vision required to read or recognize faces.
