• Cleisthenes72@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I admit I voted for this scumbag’s party for the first time ever strategically (I thought) in order to prevent an even bigger scumbag in PP from becoming PM. Considering his actions in office re: climate I will NEVER vote Liberal again

    • Gnumile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This kind of approach is why the NDP hasn’t had any presence in Ontario for years. Many people took the attitude of “I’ll never vote NDP again” because of Bob Rae. Guess what… Different people can have different ideas and priorities, even if they belong to the same political party.

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Completely different. We’re talking preference - not absolute like/dislike. I was responding to someone saying they’d never vote liberal again. I am not asking if they like PP, just if they’d prefer PP over a liberal. So if the choice is liberal or PP, it is a salient question whether they prefer PP over a liberal. If they’d prefer a liberal over PP when those are the only viable options, then not to vote liberal is confusing, at best. So it’s a relevant question.

          • binux@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            You’re still construing said line of questioning out of thin air. There’s nothing concrete in the relevant comment to imply that you need to question whether they would prefer Poilievre over any other candidate, rhetorically or otherwise. (Besides, what is the functional difference between like and dislike vs. personal preference in this case? That’s a pedantic point at best and at worst a completely useless one.)

            Additionally, why are you presuming that Liberals and Conservatives are the only viable options? Isn’t the whole point of having a wide variety of candidates like we do so you never feel pressured into only one or two options? Sure, you can say there would never be enough votes for, say, the NDP or Green Party for them to win a majority; but there’s still no inherent responsibility of any one voter for those parties to choose another because of that, and much more a societally ubiquitous/systemic issue. If one is forced, by circumstance or otherwise, into picking one or the other candidate out of many, then there are much bigger and more “salient” (as you put it) problems at hand than just which of those choices one prefers.