A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of smoke rising after Iranian missiles impact a US military site in Bahrain.


My weekly preamble is in spoiler tags below.

preamble

After a few weeks of both diplomatic and military manuevering - mostly over Iranian control of Hormuz - we have hit the hottest phase of military exchanges since at least the MoU period began. The US has generally focussed on striking southern Iran, although they have also sporadically hit transportation infrastructure elsewhere, which was repaired in less than 24 hours. Meanwhile, Iran has struck a wide range of targets, with an interesting focus on Jordan, but has, up to the time of me writing this, so far relented on striking the Zionist entity. The US and Iran have had little periods of mutual military strikes during the “ceasefire” before, and so it’s hard to tell for sure whether this yet another temporary spat or if it represents a full return to the pre-ceasefire conflict.

A complicating factor in this conflict is that Ansarallah has become increasingly active, and seems eager to start to break the siege it has been put under by threatening to attack Saudi Arabia and Saudi-aligned forces. This has put Iran in a somewhat awkward spot. On the one hand, it has greatly helped Ansarallah resist foreign attackers and has even recently sent civilian airplanes into Sana’a to begin to break the siege. On the other hand, Iran has, with China’s help, generally desired to improve its relationship with the Saudis over the years. While in this latest war there have been a major dispute between them over whether Iran is “allowed” to strike US military infrastructure located in Saudi Arabia, the Saudis strike me as considerably less anti-Iran as the UAE, let alone the Zionists, and did send a delegation to Khamenei’s funeral. I guess we’ll just have to see what happens next, but I strongly suspect that Iran is going to help Yemen over the Saudis.

And finally, Lindsay Graham has died of a sudden heart attack a suspiciously short time after visiting Ukraine. He was a true enemy of civilian populations all the way to the end of his life, and he seemed to particularly despise children. He advocated for using nukes against Gaza and the total annihilation of anybody and everybody who had even the meekest criticism of Zionism. If God (and, more pertinently in this case, Satan) does exist, I hope Graham is extended the exact same level of courtesy and respect in the afterlife that Graham extended to all Palestinians.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 days ago

    Brazil Court Suspends Flavio Bolsonaro’s Visits to Former President - Telesur English

    Article

    Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court Justice suspended for 90 days the visits of Senator Flávio Bolsonaro to his father, former President Jair Bolsonaro, after the senator published a political letter on social media written by the ex-president, violating court-imposed restrictions.

    According to the ruling, Flávio Bolsonaro read and published a letter in which his father endorsed him as a presidential pre-candidate for the 2026 elections and defined him as his “spokesperson” and the “best option” for Brazil.

    For Justice Moraes, this conduct violated the prohibition that prevents the former President from using social media, even indirectly.

    The decision came after the Court determined that the senator deviated from the purpose of a visit by disseminating political content on behalf of his father. The letter constituted a clear attempt to influence the electoral process from within the confines of house arrest, where Jair Bolsonaro has been held since November 2025.

    Judge Alexandre de Moraes noted that the phrase used by Flávio Bolsonaro when presenting the document –“It’s unmissable, a very important message he wants to give to our entire nation”– suggests that the former President had knowledge of the publication. This formulation implied coordinated action between father and son to bypass the communication restrictions imposed by the Court.

    The magistrate also sent copies of the case to the Prosecutor General for Electoral Affairs to evaluate a possible investigation for alleged early electoral propaganda, a violation of Brazilian electoral law that prohibits campaigning before the official period begins.

    As a consequence of the ruling, father and son will not be able to meet until mid-October, after the first round of presidential elections, scheduled for October 4. The 90-day suspension effectively removes Flávio Bolsonaro’s physical access to his father during the critical period leading up to the vote, where the senator is positioning himself as a candidate.

    The magistrate also granted a 48-hour deadline to Jair Bolsonaro’s defense team to clarify whether the ex-president knew that the letter would be publicly disclosed. The response could determine whether additional sanctions are imposed on the Brazilian former President, who is already serving a 27-year and three-month prison sentence for being found guilty of leading a criminal organization that attempted to perpetrate a coup d’état to remain in power after his defeat in the 2022 elections.

    Judge Alexandre de Moraes further argued that the senator used the right to visit for a purpose different from that authorized by the Court and recalled that a similar precedent occurred in August 2025. That episode was one of the arguments that later led to the imposition of house arrest on the former President, demonstrating a pattern of behavior that the court deemed unacceptable.

    The publication of the letter has also provoked a new crisis within the Liberal Party, amid growing tensions between Flávio Bolsonaro and former first lady Michelle Bolsonaro. While Flávio has positioned himself as his father’s political heir, Michelle has also been mentioned as a possible candidate, creating a rift that threatens to fragment the conservative base.

    The Supreme Federal Court has maintained a firm stance on enforcing the restrictions imposed on Jair Bolsonaro, viewing the house arrest conditions as essential safeguards against further attempts to destabilize Brazil’s democratic institutions.