• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is typical tech timeline too. Everything is so rushed that shit literally happen in minutes.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I’m going to destroy the servers and db then murder the janitor with a hammer.

    Oops *deploy

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Assuming green is the boss: I totally agree. If you don’t proofread your texts before hitting send, that might be indicative of how you deploy things, too.

    I’d love to know how the story continues - did they lose their job? - but considering the JPEG patina on this I don’t think we’ll ever find out.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I doubt it’s real. Most of the screenshots here are just Ai generated for people to react to. It’s entertainment.

    • untorquer@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Normally i would disagree completely as texts have crappy input on a small screen and are meant to be fast. I have typos in mine constantly because swide input and it’s obvious what the word should have been.

      But yeah, an important text like this does merit at least one read through.

      • filcuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        My texts are rubbish because, somehow, the keyboard predictions & autocorrect are worse now than 5 years ago. We have LLMs barfing out fully coherent sentences on their own, how does this even happen.

        • untorquer@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, we could have functional input but no we have to destroy our planet to summarize a one sentence email into a multi-paragraph bulleted list - it’s bullshit

          on android Heliboard + the swype library is ok. It’s at least consistent.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I barely proof read anything I type on my phone, and my comment history is a testament to that. I deploy code or system changes most days, but I proof read the shit out of those on top of the QC they goes through. Any company worth anything will have a process for reviewing and approving anything being deployed, or probably destroyed for that matter.

      • almost1337@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Up until recently I worked for a company worth anything, and you would be surprised at how *many" major outages were caused by either skipping the process or gaps in the process.

        You know that adage: “the safety rules are written in blood”? The same is true for change processes, just with a cost measured in dollars instead of human injury/worse.

        • Sergio@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Or sometimes there are just multiple failures. That’s what I learned from reading Admiral Cloudberg about air disasters: even if you have n safety measures, there’s still the chance that there’ll be n+1 failures.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Code should ideally be going through tests before prod anyway. There should be no code changed from successful test to prod. Proofreading shouldn’t matter at that point. Just scheduling the actual deploy.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I mostly mean proof what I’ve written prior to having someone else test. I often will comment out lines when trying different things so I just make sure I clean up what I’ve done. We have a few human checks as well as some automated checks between each stage of deployment for each environment.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah that’s what the MRs are supposed to be for. To catch those and proofread.

            There shouldn’t be any changes at all from the last test to going to production though. Even cleaning up comments.

            • BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Correct. I’m just saying that I proof read my work, that I deploy things, and that I don’t proof read my texts.

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                No I got that. I’m saying that by the time the prod deploy comes around, there’s no proofreading left to do anyway.

                Not proofreading texts should have zero bearing on being able to write and deploy software because it should be proofread several times before the actual prod deployment. Hell it very likely isn’t even the same person doing the deployment that wrote the code.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      could just be ADHD. the impulse to speak your mind rarely translates to the impulse to speak to da computah

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The older the jpeg the more likely it is that he’s moved on to another job by now.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I had a coworker who tried something like this on a federal holiday, ended up bringing down production on everyone’s day off, and ruining a bunch of people’s days to clean up the mess just because someone was trying to go above and beyond.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He’ll be the next US president, but for that he’ll have to actually destroy everything he touches, not just make threats to do it.

    • rose56@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Because if you are about to destroy the db and you dont pick up the calls, you give him the day, so he wont do it. Thats what I get.

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Some people try to work the weekend or weird hours, even when no one asked them to.

      And a deploy by someone you don’t trust to deploy on the weekend would be a concerning situation