• Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 小时前

    You’ve done nothing but argue some pedantic point of the origin that doesn’t really have anything to do with my original point, I don’t see this going anywhere so I’m not going to waste my time with it

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 小时前

          I don’t think monopolies are the “end goal of capitalism”, nor the rest of what he said.

          What a weird question to ask in the context of the conversation. I noid you genuinely think I said something that implied that?

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 小时前

            I think you’re partially right. Because the end goal of capitalism is fascism. But then again fascism often does consist of monopolies. So glass half full.

          • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 小时前

            You talked about his original point, that was literally his first post. That was his Original Point. That monopolies are the end goal of capitalism.

            Which they absolutely are, you’re just legitimately wrong. Capitalism inevitably ends in monopolies that’s why we have to break monopolies to artificially constrain capitalism. I mean honestly I’m flabbergasted that this has to be explained to you. Cuz just look around you. Name one industry in which that’s not happening. It’s inevitable.