• xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There is lots wrong with Canonical imho, but this isn’t the place for it.

    Debian here. IMO “btw” is reserved for a particular distribution and you know which one it is.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I have even the smallest bit of time and headspace to dedicate to it, I will switch back to Debian as it was always my favourite but really can’t deal with it at the moment.

      • adr1an@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Linux Mint Debian Edition is just great for that case. If I were not so much into fedora’s rpm-ostree I would be using that, or MX Linux.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I were not so much into fedora’s rpm-ostree

          Dude, right? I’ve thought about switching to cachy or something, but every time I just can’t bring myself to give up ostree.

          • axx@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Silverblue manages to be exciting yet boring.

            As in, it is great for everyday work yet still uses newfangled tech under the hood.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I think I’m lucky in that I only had about 1.5-2 years of experience with an Arch-based distro (EndeavourOS) before switching to Bazzite, so I didn’t have to unlearn years (if not decades) of traditional Linux work flows before trying to grasp the new tech.

              And I love it. Anything that I’ve wanted to tinker with so far has been tinkerable, it’s often just a different process than on a non-atomic or immutable distro.

              And aside from that, it’s insanely stable. It’s almost impossible to break it by accident, and if you do, it has instant, failsafe rollbacks.

              Anyway, I know I don’t have to sell you on it lol.

              The other day I was looking into “Blue Build” which allows to build your own custom Universal Blue spins, as I was wondering if it were possible to have Bazzite but with the Cachy kernel.

              I think that’s a bit over my head at the moment though haha

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like Debian, it is boring in the best way.

        I really did not like the process of upgrading from one stable version of Debian to the next. It went OK, but i remember being anxious the whole time, compared to Ubuntu’s gui workflow, and failing that, the one-command cli version that i always have to look up

        • ratel@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I love a boring OS that just works for 90% of things and you just live with whatever the other 10% is - usually some driver quirks or peripheral funk.

          I’ve never used the gui for upgrade but I also have a hard time remembering do-make-release.

    • Dymonika@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      you know which one it is.

      As of the latest dumpster fires over there, they’re wanting to hide it nowadays!

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dumpster fires? Do you mean the untrusted repository of user-submitted build scripts getting malicious user-submitted content? :P

        Keep your official packages and AUR separate, if nothing else at least don’t pull from both sources with the same command

        • Dymonika@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know how Arch works as a Minter here. That’s good that there’s a separation line… Not sure if Mint’s Software Mgr has that…

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I suspect Mint might just not have anything like the AUR.

            AUR stands for Arch User Repository, and it’s a place where anybody can create a package. But those packages aren’t going into a regular repository, instead they’re kept as build scripts, simple code that describes how to make a package.

            This is useful for two reasons - it allows users to share packages that aren’t making it into the official repositories (because not everything will, there’s just too much stuff out there), but it can also have things which can’t go into the repos due to licensing (because the AUR doesn’t distribute the software, just instructions on how to automatically get it)

            There’s no official utility to install packages from the AUR - you have to find a package you want on the site, clone the repository, and run makepkg to build and install it. And for updates you have to pull changes and rebuild it manually. And you’re supposed to check yourself to make sure what you’re installing is safe. But there are popular unofficial utilities that are intended to replace Arch’s built-in package management, automatically finding packages both in the trusted repositories and the untrusted AUR, with no separation.