fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 days agoGrowthmander.xyzimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up11.02K
arrow-up11.02KimageGrowthmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square190fedilink
minus-squareZombie-Mantis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·14 days agoThat they thought “bisexual” excluded furries, and “pansexual” included furries.
minus-squareCyberTheProtogen@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·14 days agoWhy would anyone…? Huh?
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·14 days agoMakes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys
minus-squareZombie-Mantis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·14 days agoI once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days ago“Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoIts a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.
That they thought “bisexual” excluded furries, and “pansexual” included furries.
Why would anyone…? Huh?
Makes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys
I once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.
“Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.
Its a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.