• bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I mean its a small company. We have become too used to subsidized costs at the sake of our privacy. Know why TVs are now $200? They are literal spyware in the home. Try buying one without spyware, $999 real fast for the same TV.

      Know why phone companies give you a “free” $1000 phone? Youre the product. Constantly tracked and sold. A digital slave.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        People don’t know this it seems. You actually have to give up something to gain some privacy. Can be money, can be features.

        Most people still use Google while there is Kagi for like 10 dollars… Because they want privacy, but they need it to be free. :)

      • mecen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not free, and on pixels you can install de googled androids like grapheneos and LineageOS

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Pinephone was a fraction of that price. Can’t you run PostmarketOS on a Fair phone too? But that has much better specs.

        • OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The pinephone was atrocious (As a daily) though. From what I’ve heard from owners it still struggles to this day to run basic mobile Linux OSes.

          • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Fact. It’s amazing that it exists, but it is definitely not a daily driver device. At least for me.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Buuutt are you someone who travels and uses airline and banking and hotel apps? Or do you stay home and use arch on a thinkpad ?

              /joky

              • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I have done all of those things without apps. Why the fuck would I want an airline and hotel app?

                • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  Hotel: check in to room immediately without even going to front desk, even if its 3 am.

                  Airline: instant update of gate changes. When you need to sprint to make your flight because thr gate changed to one a half mile away, this is something you can’t live without. TVs are getting less and less in airports now. Also, literally no one uses a paper ticket and I suspect they’ll be phased out completely in 5 years. Too easy to fake.

                  There are people alive today who have never once written a check (I do, often), so you can kiss all of our old analog paper ways goodbye in a few years.

                  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Yeah I have never written a cheque either but I don’t need an app as an alternative. Don’t really see why I would need an app to tell me about gate changes at an airport, how often are you flying? I have changed devices more often than I have been in airports.

      • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Phone companies dont give you a “free” $1000 phone, you’re actually paying more for it via the monthly bill payments.

        That’s on top of you being the product as well.

      • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        I think this is the real answer, rather than the other comment about users being monetized. There are plenty of affordable Android phones with decent specs that have no spyware besides Google’s, and Google’s not subsidizing them.

        There are also still dumbphones on the market for under $100. I don’t see Android app support as that big a selling point with these specs.

        Good luck to them, but I don’t think this is a viable niche.