cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 8 days agoProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1189cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1189imageProton has respond on redditlemmy.mlcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 8 days agomessage-square72fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-27 days agoJust curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 days ago… not used an LLM to write their apology? I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-27 days agoThere is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking. Would you have preferred no apology at all?
minus-squareHeartyOfGlass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoMy preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoAnd, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼
Just curious, what could they have possibly done instead that would satisfy you?
… not used an LLM to write their apology?
I mean, I’m satisfied. This indicates to me they don’t care. That’s all I need to hear.
There is no proof they used an LLM. Plus, LLMs are trained on human text anyway, who actually talk like this… it’s not like LLMs invented their own way of speaking.
Would you have preferred no apology at all?
My preference is for companies to not use LLMs for public communication.
And, the scholarly applause of us anons, of course. ☝🏼