Sahwa@reddthat.com to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 day agoNewPipe, other open-source apps are preparing users for Google's sideloading crackdown on Androidwww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1187
arrow-up1187external-linkNewPipe, other open-source apps are preparing users for Google's sideloading crackdown on Androidwww.androidauthority.comSahwa@reddthat.com to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareDudeImMacGyver@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·14 hours agoHow the fuck are open source apps a “legally grey area”!?
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-213 hours agoYeah I am pretty pissed off that this article is conflating issues by even suggesting this. The legal grey area they are alluding to is ad blocking. I don’t think it’s grey but that has to be what they are saying. But the article is about third party apps and Google being a fuckwit. This waters down the discussion, and is a unnecessary diversion.
minus-squareDudeImMacGyver@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·13 hours agoAd blocking isn’t even a legal grey area, it’s legal (as it should be, ads are a major attack vector for malware and scams).
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·13 hours agoI agree with you, yet I am sure there are lawyers who will argue that it would be against their terms of service. I am with the old school crowd: you put stuff on the internet however you like, and I will render it however I like.
minus-squareDudeImMacGyver@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoTheir TOS can get fucked and it’s certainly not law: They’re free to deny service or ban users if they like, but I’m sure that’d go over like a lead balloon.
How the fuck are open source apps a “legally grey area”!?
Yeah I am pretty pissed off that this article is conflating issues by even suggesting this.
The legal grey area they are alluding to is ad blocking. I don’t think it’s grey but that has to be what they are saying.
But the article is about third party apps and Google being a fuckwit.
This waters down the discussion, and is a unnecessary diversion.
Ad blocking isn’t even a legal grey area, it’s legal (as it should be, ads are a major attack vector for malware and scams).
I agree with you, yet I am sure there are lawyers who will argue that it would be against their terms of service.
I am with the old school crowd: you put stuff on the internet however you like, and I will render it however I like.
Their TOS can get fucked and it’s certainly not law: They’re free to deny service or ban users if they like, but I’m sure that’d go over like a lead balloon.