• lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 年前

    And also because there’s no snow or serious rain. Took me years to get used to the flimsy houses here, they wouldn’t last a year back in my country.

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 年前

      I don’t know about that. I’ve lived in a typical “flimsy” American wooden house in an area that had a lot of crazy weather with extreme winds and even a couple of tropical storms. That house had absolutely no issue with those. These houses are a lot stronger than they look. They flex but don’t break.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        My house is 80 years old, I’ve personally seen 3 feet of snow on its roof, it weathered hurricane Fran with no damage, hurricane Matthew caused a leak around the chimney that stained my living room ceiling a little.

        I’m ready to take anything this area is willing to throw at me except tornadoes. A direct strike by tornado will pull it down.

    • Stoney_Logica1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      I live in the Pacific Northwest where it rains quite a bit. Wood houses are fine in the rain as long as the moisture barrier and roof have been installed correctly.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      Canada also builds houses out of wood. There’s pretty serious snow here and the houses work great.

      I also live in one of the the windiest cities in Canada . The asphalt shingles have blown off houses frequently, but the houses themselves are solid.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        I’m pretty sure those wooden houses in Canada are built differently from wooden houses in California. The ones I’ve seen are thin wooden struts covered with some drywall.

        Edit: and just saying “flimsy” by comparison to the usual reinforced concrete structures back home. I now own a home in California and it’s definitely solid.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 年前

          So funnily enough, 2x4 exterior walls meet code for 3 stories, but where I am, it doesn’t meet the insulation requirements of minimum r-20, so it’s normally built with 2x6.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 年前

        I know it is possible to build solid houses out of wood. The ones I’m talking about would 100% not withstand blizzards or tornadoes.

        Like most in my native country, I grew up in a building made entirely of solid reinforced concrete slabs, including most interior walls. I could not hear my upstairs or downstairs neighbors and when I saw people punching holes in the walls in American movies I thought it’s just an exaggeration, not something that can actually happen. Wooden houses were culturally associated with poor rural people who couldn’t afford living in a nice solid apartment. That culture persists today, and even in isolated villages new homes are built with concrete structures and brick walls.

        When I bought a piece of land and was looking at options for new houses, I found a company making very solid wooden homes (still a lot more solid than the average Bay Area home) for reasonable prices and both my and my wife’s families were outraged at the idea of building a house out of wood.

        Just some random background to why I’d use the word “flimsy” for wooden struts sandwiched between drywall sheets.