• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m being anti-authoritarian, not racist. Besides, Russians will say their Asian one day and European the next. They’re an odd bunch.

        • Rindogang@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Oh please. If you were truly anti authoritarian you’d recognize that a state enforcing the will of one group over another is authoritarianism, but when it’s a side you like, you don’t call it that

          And Russia is often not considered European simply because it’s fighting the West for resources… for the exact same reason Latin America is excluded from the ‘‘West’’ despite its culture

  • BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    When the empire dissolves we’re going to have to root these freaks out, one by one, regionally, until the whole continent is de-nazified. We’re going to be tearing down barbed wire and jails for the rest of my life.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      too entrenched especially with the DINOS who are the other republicans, would take over if, even the magat-y ones somehow gets removed.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is there a paywall on the original? I don’t see one, but I have scripts disabled.

        • who@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Then try to imagine that some people do exactly that, and the rest of us don’t know you or commenting habits.

          My question was therefore reasonable. It was also informative, by letting other readers know they can avoid that kind of paywall without revealing their interests to the dodgy archive site.

          Your response reads like snark, which doesn’t help anyone. I’ll try convince myself that you didn’t mean it that way.

          • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            It wasn’t snark, but mild confusion. If my response was snark, then your question prompting it could be interpreted as condescending brag. Compounded now by the seemingly absurd attempt at justification by claiming some people go through the effort of creating & providing needless non-paywall archive links just because they can. Never mind the arrogant, self-righteous tone.

            Whatever. This is pointless. Chao.

            • who@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              It wasn’t snark, but mild confusion.

              In that case, I’m sorry for misunderstanding.

              I hope you can understand that at least nine times out of ten, a response like yours (instead of simply answering or ignoring the question) turns out to be from someone looking for a fight. I’m glad to find that the last sentence of my reply turned out to be warranted, at first. Lashing out really wasn’t necessary.

              Whatever. This is pointless. Chao.

              Fair enough. Ciao.