The motivations that have contributed to the separatist movement and Alberta’s sense of grievance in recent years are not especially discrete; it’s more like a nebulous Venn diagram. Simple politics have pushed some people toward separatism. Indeed, the paucity of separatist talk during the time when Stephen Harper was prime minister suggests there’s a significant political component to the idea; when Liberals are in power, people feel more inclined to talk about leaving. Culture also plays a role. When Angus Reid pollsters talked to separatists in February 2026, 86.5 percent said they thought Canada forced Alberta to take in too many immigrants, and 96 percent believed that an independent Alberta would better protect personal freedoms.

But … separatists tend to find the economic arguments particularly seductive. Angus Reid polling shows 96 percent of respondents who want an independent Alberta believe they would be free from economically damaging federal government policies. Separatist leaders promise the elimination of the personal income tax while creating a new provincial sales tax of 5 percent. They also claim Alberta would save $75 billion from no longer paying federal taxes.

Not all separatists promise immediate prosperity, but the argument remains persuasive. Cameron Davies is the leader of the Republican Party of Alberta. “I don’t paint an immediate rosy, utopian picture of what independence looks like,” he says. “Will it be difficult? Yes. Will it be immediate sunshine and rainbows? Probably not. But will it be worth it? Five, ten, fifteen years down the road for your kids and your grandkids? One hundred percent yes.”

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because we are a country, and patriotic people, not Patriots™ support people in other parts of the country. It’s not AB vs QC or the east - we are unified.

    Also, please stop downvoting this guy. Maybe an unpopular take, but it’s central to the broader discussion and directly tied to the article itself

    • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I try to be respectful in my replies and also appreciate there are and should be different views on a topic. FWIW, I don’t live in Alberta, I live in Manitoba a province that also benefits from Alberta equalization payments.

      Yes, it is a country and we are (mostly) united. Which is exactly why we should listen to issues raised by others, even when they don’t fit with our narrative. Quebec is happy to take Alberta’s oil money transfer payments while they thumb their nose at any request to run a pipeline through the province. Very hypocritical in my opinion.

      EDIT: Hilarious this comment is downvoted. What’s the issue? Can’t put a sentence together so just click the downvote button?

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a fair point, about blocking pipelines. BC is in the same boat in that regard.

        Oil is a tough one - it’s a very valuable resource but it’s got a big stigma tied to it due to GHGs and spills. I wish we were collectively doing more about climate change, rather than just using it as an argument when it suits us, but that’s beside the point

        On the whole, we need to be a lot more collaborative. Western resentment is real, and somewhat justified, but you don’t cut off your arm to spite your finger

        • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          In my opinion, this is happening to get exposure to their grievances. As I said earlier, I hope Carney takes the challenge seriously.