Smackyroon@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 days agoAnd the other is an image of some tankslemmy.mlimagemessage-square384fedilinkarrow-up1576
arrow-up1576imageAnd the other is an image of some tankslemmy.mlSmackyroon@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 days agomessage-square384fedilink
minus-squareiceonfire1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-212 hours agoSo just to clarify, you think that: 1.) you can provide the correct source for another person’s statement 2.) what you posted qualifies as a source even though you did not give one 3.) it’s OK if the statement does not agree with the source 4.) you can justify your misattribution by cherry-picking a number that “roughly” agrees if you massage it Bruh.
So just to clarify, you think that:
1.) you can provide the correct source for another person’s statement
2.) what you posted qualifies as a source even though you did not give one
3.) it’s OK if the statement does not agree with the source
4.) you can justify your misattribution by cherry-picking a number that “roughly” agrees if you massage it
Bruh.