• Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    And both pictures show off firsthand a brutal government dictatorship (in everything but name) that is actively going against the will of its people and stamping down boots on the throats of civilians who dare question or hesitate in the face of their rule.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      stamping down boots on the throats of civilians who dare question or hesitate in the face of their rule.

      Comrades, you ever notice how when communists write about things like this it reads like a history book and when libs write about things like it it reads like young adult fiction? These mfs think they’re giving a speech in a movie

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The protestors in Tian’anmen were a mix of Gang of Four hardliners upset at Reform and Opening Up, and student protestors backed by the CIA that wanted to liberalize the economy. They didn’t have a consistent goal. Decades later, over 90% of the public in China support their government:

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well they kinda have to or one of those murder vans shows up. A lot of doctors regularly get 100 percent of the vote. That must mean they were beloved dictators?

          • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            He is saying a lot of dictators have 100% approval ratings. Misspelled it as doctor.

            And the “murder vans” is a reference to execution vans that China uses.

            Yunnan officials authorized the use of execution vans in March 2003 and the province deployed 18 vans in the same year. Zhao Shijie, president of the Yunnan Provincial High Court, said, “The use of lethal injection shows that China’s death penalty system is becoming more civilized and humane”. Amnesty International expressed concern that the use of execution vans could increase the use of executions. The Supreme People’s Court encouraged provinces to adopt execution vans in December 2003.[2]

            There is a lot of activity about the vans being talked about online I am surprised you haven’t heard of this before.

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Your evidence for the claim “Yunnan officials have started using execution vans at the behest of the Supreme People’s Court and Amnesty International is concerned” is…

              …the Wikipedia pages for Yunnan, Amnesty International and the Supreme People’s Court.

              Did you think people wouldn’t check?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 days ago

              Execution vans aren’t a real thing, though. China does have the death penalty, but not in this comical way, same as PLA suicide helmets. I’ve seen the claim before, but it’s ridiculous to believe them. You can see that the sources in the Wikipedia article don’t even back up what is claimed.

              As for the idea that “a lot of dictators have 100% approval ratings,” I don’t see how it matters. Fear of the possibility of something isn’t evidence of it happening.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          If the Chinese people agree with you, they’re being honest. If the Chinese people disagree with you, they actually secretly agree with you but are too scared to say it.

          Bro this is just political Niceguyism. “No dude she totally likes me and hates her boyfriend of 5 years, she’s just too afraid of him to show it. He’s probably abusive.”

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          No? Harvard studied this, it’s because the government consistently delivers on its ambitious promises in uplifting the lives of working people.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              2 days ago

              You have a hypothesis with no backing. Back up your hypothesis, or accept that the citizenry of China support it because it works really well and is getting better all the time. Obviously people would change a lot about China, the major difference is that they expect the government to bring about that change, rather than assuming it won’t.

              Further, no, the rioters in Beijing were firebombing PLA vehicles and lynching officers before the PLA was sent in. That’s why hundreds died.