You@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agoUK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008www.dw.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1162cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1162external-linkUK moves to ban smoking for everyone born after 2008www.dw.comYou@feddit.org to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarehopesdead@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoWhy not just ban smoking?
minus-squarecadekat@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 months agoIf I were to guess, it’s because a blanket ban would turn the people who actually go out and vote against you.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoI’d’ve assumed the addiction factor. Forcing an addict to quit could cause stress that won’t be present for those who haven’t started, yet. But literally just a guess, on my part.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoBecause of the existing addicts. It would create a black market.
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoBecause people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?
Why not just ban smoking?
If I were to guess, it’s because a blanket ban would turn the people who actually go out and vote against you.
I’d’ve assumed the addiction factor. Forcing an addict to quit could cause stress that won’t be present for those who haven’t started, yet.
But literally just a guess, on my part.
Because of the existing addicts. It would create a black market.
Because people don’t like to be told what to do. Why create a black market when there is already a steep and steady decline?