• GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lewis’s proposals seem reasonable to me. On one hand you can’t just have a destabilizingly high rate of immigration, but on the other it’s extremely unjust to just deport a bunch of people who are already here, Trump style. We need a reasonable level of immigration as well as protection for refugees - this century is going to see a massive influx of refugees in general, and if we become Festung Kanada it will rot us from the inside out.

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sure, eat the young to feed the rich old boomers that own all the real estate. Let’s see if that resonates.

      • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        At some point we’re going to have to definancialize housing, and the NDP Lewis is the closest option to that. The libs and cons sure as hell would never do it

        • maplesaga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Its financialized due to cheap debt and a shortages, caused by the BoC and the NDP themselves supporting mass immigration.

          I don’t see anything Avi is pushing to definancialize it, if anything he wants to exacerbate shortages to encourage further speculation. I’d be curious what you think he’s suggesting that will accomplish it.

          • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Broadly, he’s a step in the right direction, turning the NDP back to its socialist roots. At some point we could just have the government build housing and old age pensions, eliminating the need to have a house be a financial instrument for retirement

            • maplesaga@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Margins aren’t very high on houses for developers, its largely government policy that is the highest cost, largely things like zoning and developer taxes. So how far can prices possibly fall by eliminating the developer profit, 10% as a non-profit, assuming they can do it with the same efficiency?

              • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You also eliminate contractor profit and so on. Much of the cost is also tied up in land value, which can be simply expropriated.