(Trigger warning: mention of sexual assault)

All unaccompanied immigrant children who are pregnant, many byremoved, are being moved to a single facility in Texas in order to avoid providing abortion services in a significant human rights violation, critics say.

As detainees are frequently moved across state lines quickly, often to red states like Texas, pregnant people are facing challenges accessing reproductive health care in detention centers.

Unaccompanied minors who lack immigration documentation are at high risk for trafficking and other forms of harm, so they fall under the care of the office of refugee resettlement (ORR), which previously had facilities across the country capable of caring for children under the age of 18 who are pregnant.

Since July, more than a dozen pregnant children have been moved to a single facility in the small town of San Benito, along the south Texas border. The children kept in Texas are as young as 13, and about half are pregnant because ofremoved, according to a joint investigation by the Texas Newsroom and the California Newsroom. In Texas, abortion is banned in nearly all circumstances, includingremoved and incest.

“It’s a choice to ensure zero abortions,” said Jonathan White, a former top official working with children’s programs in the ORR under the Obama and Trump administrations. When a pregnant child is moved to Texas, “as long as she is in Texas, she can’t access an abortion – without a federal official needing to deny her an abortion”, he said.

The move amplifies existing concerns about reproductive healthcare in immigration detention centers, including allegations over the lack of appropriate healthcare for pregnant people, separation of nursing parents and infants, and forced sterilization in immigration facilities.

The “total disregard” for the rights of pregnant and nursing detainees is a “dramatic violation” of international law and public health practices ensuring consensual medical treatment, said Diana Romero, professor and director of the Center on Immigrant, Refugee and Global Health at the CUNY graduate school of public health.

Forcing any individual to carry a pregnancy to term is an “egregious” violation of rights, and relocation from other locations around the country to states with more restrictive abortion laws “adds a whole other layer of concern”, Romero said.

White added that “making the decision for these girls whether they will give birth to theirremoved’s baby” is “an extraordinary human rights problem.”

“Everyone attempts to write their politics on the bodies of these children,” he said.

The typical age of pregnant unaccompanied minors is 15 or 16, though they can be even younger, White said. “They’re not grown women. They’re little girls,” he said. Because of their young age, “many of them will be comparatively high-risk pregnancies” who need specialized care – yet it’s not clear whether the south Texas facility, which is hours away from major cities, is equipped to offer that care.

The government does not track the prevalence of sexual assault experienced by unaccompanied girls under the age of 18, but other organizations estimate the rate to be between 80% and 90%, White said. “When I was in the program, about half of the pregnant girls related that their pregnancy was a result of sexual abuse or sexual assault, either in home country or in transit,” White said. Many girls don’t learn they are pregnant until they undergo an exam under ORR’s care.

The office of refugee resettlement is housed within the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but it is now directed by a career immigration official.

When asked whether the pregnant girls were receiving appropriate care, whether other pregnant detainees were also being moved to states with restrictive abortion laws, and the extent to which ORR is now controlled by immigration officials, HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said: “These claims are completely inaccurate,” adding that ORR “remains committed to ensuring the safety, well-being, and appropriate care” for the children in its custody.

TLDR: ICE is r****g immigrant women and young girls, then sending them to a Texas concentration camp to prevent them from aborting.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    There’s never a single cause behind anything but I would not be surprised that an egregious and horrifying amount of sex crimes have been committed and they want to shuffle the evidence around to obfuscate.

  • Euergetes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 days ago

    forcing babies to be born which they will deny appropriate health care and food to, and try to deport. at a certain point you really genuinely start to believe these people are banking up suffering on behalf of some hideous religion, the most expensive and elaborate system of torture ever devised being extracted on young women/girls and literal babies just because they feel like it.

    may this heap of sins be matched by the righteous retribution meted upon the perpetrators sicko-wistful

    • Drithvan [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its not just the fact that they are forcing these babies to be born.

      It’s also the fact that these babies are the result of sexual assault committed by ICE officers against women in detention camps.

  • varmint [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    For a second I thought they were forcing immigrants to get abortions and white girls to carry unwanted pregnancies.

    This is demonic too. Evil country

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    I obviously wouldn’t put it past ICE and in fact somewhat expect them to be responsible for much of the abuse, but where does the article say that that ICE agents are doing the r***? Am I misreading something?

    • Drithvan [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      How else would women and young girls be getting pregnant in a female-only detention center?

      Couple that with aerial footage of agents taking women into completely shuttered buildings for lengths of time before leaving.

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Again, I’m asking where in the article it says it. It says that in half of cases they became pregnant due to abuse in their home country or in transit (i.e. the process of migrating here), so it’s clearly not just a blanket truth that they are getting pregnant in detention centers.

        “When I was in the program, about half of the pregnant girls related that their pregnancy was a result of sexual abuse or sexual assault, either in home country or in transit,"

        • StarkWolf [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think you are correct in that the article does not explicitly state that they got pregnant from ICE officers or while in detention, and that OP is making that connection based in assumption and prior evidence that may or may not support that conclusion, even if it is a reasonable assumption to make. But I would say that “in transit” could mean during their migration, it could also mean “in transit” as in it happening between their arrest and the transfer to this facility, which would implicate ICE agents in that case. So it’s hard to draw clear conclusions, the language still leaves room for OPs interpretation to be true in some of these cases.

          • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Contextually, with it being mentioned paired with abuse in their home country, I think it pretty clearly means while they are migrating. It’s furthermore a blatant misreading that it says that any of this happens in “a female-only detention center” as the comment I was responding to mis-summarizes it or that, as OP says in another comment:

            As the article mentions, over half of these cases of these pregnancies are due to sexual assault cases committed by ICE agents.

            (Emphasis mine)

            Obviously ICE agents engage in sexual abuse and human trafficking and so on, but it pretty clearly does not seem to be mentioned by the article despite multiple claims to the contrary being made on this thread. We really should not make a habit of supporting our claims with non-evidence, even less so when actual evidence is readily available because there is years of reporting on ICE engaging in sexual abuse/human trafficking already.