I was originally made aware of this article by a 404 Media newsletter. It’s pretty interesting, largely confirms what has already been known so far, but also gives some fresh knowledge, like how nutrients from insects might not be quite as available, even if they technically have a very similar macronutrient profile to meats. That’s because the present chitin reduces the bioavailability to a certain degree.
CONCLUSION Edible insects represent a promising complementary protein source capable of contributing to the growing global demand for sustainable and nutritionally adequate foods. They provide high-quality protein and relevant amounts of macronutrients and micronutrients, often comparable to or exceeding those of conventional animal-derived foods, while offering clear environ- mental advantages. Nevertheless, their integration into human diets requires a cautious and evidence-based approach. Current limitations include substantial variability related to insect species, developmental stage, rearing substrate and processing methods, as well as methodological heterogeneity in the assessment of pro- tein content, digestibility and bioavailability. Inconsistencies in analytical approaches, particularly regarding digestibility proto- cols and the handling of chitin-derived nitrogen, hamper compa- rability across studies and may bias protein-quality indices such as PDCAAS and DIAAS. Moreover, most evidence supporting biological activities (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cyto- toxic effects) is derived from in vitro and animal models, while human data remain limited to small, short-term studies and are insufficient to substantiate health or clinical claims. Food safety concerns, including allergenic cross-reactivity, microbial contami- nation and chemical residues, together with regulatory heteroge- neity and persistent barriers to consumer acceptance, further constrain large-scale application. To support responsible uptake, regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders should prioritize the harmonization of guidelines for rearing substrates, hygienic production, analytical methods and labeling, including clear allergen disclosure. The implementation of robust quality- management systems (good manufacturing practices (GMPs)/ HACCPs), validated processing protocols and transparent com- munication regarding origin, processing and safety is essential to build consumer trust and enable the sustainable incorporation of insect-based ingredients into food systems.


I guess it is the same reason as why people still eat meat, they want flavors, even if they nutrients consumed are worse or involves animal murder.
But even flavor isn’t an argument, because a vegan diet typically involves way more flavors. I think the strongest reason is that people who still eat meat don’t want to change long established normative structures of power. Within those structures, eating meat often is a status symbol, a symbol of masculinity and allows people to feel like they have power over someone else (the animals they eat). That’s probably why the global north hasn’t really adopted insect consumption yet, because it doesn’t fit in any of the existing structures. It’s a curiosity at best.
>allows people to feel like they have power over someone else (the animals they eat)
I doubt it…a lot of folks don’t even think about the particular animal while eating.
I think you spend too much time online.