• AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If the trolley is moving at light speed by the time it hits the station, it is impossible for anyone to get on or off because—from the trolley’s perspective—no time passes between stops. Ergo, the number of passengers on it must be the same every stop.

    If the initial number of passengers is odd or a non-zero integer, this inability to board/unboard would contradict the rules.

    Thus, in order to satisfy all the conditions, the initial number of people on the trolley must be 0. As an even number it will be subject to halving, but 0/2=0, so the rules are satisfied.

    Hence, pulling the lever is the optimal solution as 0 people will die. QED.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      No, I don’t pull the lever. I don’t want to wait for it to do infinite loops to see the gore and carnage of running over a bunch of people.

  • Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How long does it take to get an infinite number of loops in? Well, it’s going at a finite speed, so it must be an infinite amount of time. Maybe you can argue that at the speed of light causes the inside of the trolley to not experience time past that point, but there’s still all the time spent at sub-light speed accelerating. So at least an astronomical amount of time.

    And the rules as stated result in an arbitrarily large number of people on the trolley. So these people after a point aren’t being pulled from Earth, they must be being created wholesale. And then living a life out on the trolley, unless they exit.

    So the choices are really 1. Kill 5 people or 2. Create an unknown but large number of people that will live out some sort of lives on the trolley, or get shunted out into the real world, and some smaller but still large number of people that will die prematurely.

    I think life is worth living, so I prefer 2

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It will always reduce to a cycle of 4→2→1→4→2→1, so you won’t end up with a huge number.

      But yeah, it would take infinite time to reach infinite loops, and meanwhile people can get on and off, so in reality nobody dies prematurely…

      • Atlas_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        People can die on the trolley,

        Also you’re assuming the collatz conjecture.

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Motherfucker here making a math problem for infinite series from a philosophical question. Is nothing sacred /s

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    After an infinite number of loops?

    After an infinite number of loops I’d want to be killed.

    • hakase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      After an infinite number of loops are any of the original passengers still on the trolley?

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Anything moving at light speed does not experience the passage of time, so yes. Nobody can actually get off the trolley.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Without solving the collatz conjecture I think you can see it always stays above zero.

        • hakase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Sure, the total number of passengers does, but do any of the original passengers stay on the entire time as new passengers cycle on and off?

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            i think that can’t really be answered bc there’s no hard rules on who specifically gets off.

            if it’s first-on, first-off then all the original riders would cycle out in as little as 2 cycles. but if it’s first-on, LAST-off then at least 1 person from the original bunch would always be on the train.

            if it’s random, who knows! someone who took probability and statistics can work that one out lmao

  • how_we_burned@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Wouldn’t the tram require all the energy in the universe to accelerate to light speed whilst the object would create a massive wave of radiation and shock waves thus destroying everything in its path?

    Thus no more station and peoples on the rail meaning no one can get on or off.

  • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    No matter what wouldn’t this grow to infinite passengers? Is that supposed to be the point?

    Because any even number is going to halve itself down to 1, which is odd an odd number, then double plus one will always make another odd number so it would grow to infinity.

  • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It only accelerates to light speed, therefore it will need infinite time to complete the loops. Thus the risk is not the killing but getting stuck.

    If the conjecture holds, naturally there is a small cycle so people can get on and off and use the train as a form of teleporting to the future.

    If there are different loops, then still people can take turns.

    Even if there are values that diverge, if it can be shown that at least one event of division occurs with a certain average frequency in the infinite divergence, then at any such point all previous guests can exit and the train can be ridden for one such span.

    Only if there are no cases of division and endless steps of 3n+1 in the limit, would people be trapped on the train at no subjective time passing, and in essence time travel into the infinitely far future where they are killed.

  • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    2n+1 is not in the Collatz conjecture.

    Mathematics is not ready for such carelessness.

    And I did a dumb. Withdrawn.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Wouldn’t that be 3n + 1? n passengers already present, another 2n + 1 enter, resulting in a total of 3n + 1. Doing it in my head, we seem to always end up in a cycle of 4 -> 2 -> 1 -> 4. All of these are < 5, so once we enter that cycle, the number of possible passengers killed is always less than five.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      56 minutes ago

      Edit: misread the prompt, below original post is wrong, I apologize!


      Noe start with three or any odd number :p 3 , 7, 15, 31, 33…

      I think only 2^x has the outcome you describe, please correct me if I’m mistaken.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        7→22→11→34→17→52→26→13→40→20→10→5→16→8→4→2→1→4→2→1→4→2→1…

        Edit: also, 9→28→14→7…

        And, 15→46→23→70→35→106→53→160→80→40→20→10→5→16→8→4→2→1…

        Or even, 19→58→29→88→44→22→11→…

        And lest we forget, 3→10→5→16→8→4→2→1…

        That covers every odd number below 20. Want me to do 21 and 25, too? Perhaps 27?

        • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          The trick is to read the prompt. I had 2n+1 are the new number of passengers.

          Had to reconstruct it from your answer though.

          Anyway, thanks!

      • addison@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Odd numbers cause double plus one additional passengers to board. So a cycle starting with 3 is a bit different.

        3 -> 10 -> 5 -> 16 -> 8 -> 4 -> 2 -> 1 -> 4 …

  • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think everyone inside would die when it accelerated to light speed. And since most numbers are larger than 5 I’d say don’t pull the lever. The only question is what happens to the people inside the trolley if you don’t pull the lever?

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’ll always reduce to a cycle of 4→2→1→4→2→1 etc.

      Which means people can get on and off so no one is trapped, and since they don’t die until after an infinite number of stops it means no one will get killed