UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 13 hours agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1393
arrow-up1393imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·9 hours agoThat’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·5 hours agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 hours agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoRote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.