It’s hard to imagine something as fundamental to computing as the sudo command becoming abandonware, yet here we are: its solitary maintainer is asking for help to keep the project alive.

Archived version

  • aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The fact that the FOSS model is still considered the best thing ever is so sad to me. The “free” part is clearly not working. Or rather it is working as is now intended: free labour for the private sector to exploit.

    The Telekommunist Manifesto for the longer version of this 🙃

    • Bogus007@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Funny, you are using with lemmy something for free, which is to some extent in the spirit of FOSS.

    • jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not so sure the “open source” part is working either when you think about how AI tools were trained.

      It’s really sad, because the accessibility of developing software and collaborative nature of the open source community is a big part of what drew me to software engineering as a career, and it’s always been one of the first things I mention about why I love it. But, of course, these fucking evil companies found a way to take every individual part of something good and twist it into something awful.

      • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        FOSS will always be incompatible with capitalism. There is no incentive for the capitalist class to pay for the open source they consume.

      • Life is Tetris@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        There has been the “4opens” criteria, that has been more on point than free/libre/open source.

        In hindsight, defeating corporate and AI piggery might have needed single-maintainer closed source with open protocols. Software components? Maybe it would have led to the compound document model instead of the app model, architecturally enforcing openness.