i analyzed with AI my 36gb~ that I was able to download before they erased the zip file from the server.

Complete Volume Analysis

  Based on the OPT metadata file, here's what VOL00009 was supposed to contain:

  Full Volume Specifications

  - Total Bates-numbered pages: 1,223,757 pages
  - Total unique PDF files: 531,307 individual PDFs
  - Bates number range: EFTA00039025 to EFTA01262781
  - Subdirectory structure: IMAGES\0001\ through IMAGES\0532\ (532 folders)
  - Expected size: ~180 GB (based on your download info)

  What You Actually Got

  - PDF files received: 90,982 files
  - Subdirectories: 91 folders (0001 through ~0091)
  - Current size: 37 GB
  - Percentage received: ~17% of the files (91 out of 532 folders)

  The Math

  Expected:  531,307 PDF files / 180 GB / 532 folders
  Received:   90,982 PDF files /  37 GB /  91 folders
  Missing:   440,325 PDF files / 143 GB / 441 folders

  ★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────
  You got approximately the first 17% of the volume before the server deleted it. The good news is that the DAT/OPT index files are complete, so you have a full manifest of what should be there. This means:
  - You know exactly which documents are missing (folders 0092-0532)

I haven’t looked into downloading the partials from archive.org yet to see if I have any useful files that archive.org doesn’t have yet from dataset 9.

I have heard its 186gb

thats pretty cool…

Can you send me a DM of the 51? if i come across one and it isnt some sketchy porn i’ll let u know

where… I dont see it here https://dreadytognbh7m5nlmqsogzzlxjy75iuxkulewbhxcorupbqahact2yd.onion/

this dude on pastebin posted his filetree in his epstein ubuntu env - i have a high confidence in whatever lives in his DataSet9Complete.zip file haha

same

Have a scraper running on web.archive.org pulling all previously posted Court-Records and FOIA (docs,audio,etc.) from Jan 30th

I told you…

We need dataset 9…

We definitely need a crowdsourced method for going through all the files. I am currently building a solo cytoscape tool to try out making an affiliation graph, but expanding this to be a tool for a community, with authorization to just allow whitelisted individuals work on it, that’s beyond my scope and I can’t volunteer to make such an important tool, but I am happy to offer my help building it. I can convert my existing tool to a prototype if anyone wants to collaborate with me on it. I am an amateur, but I will spend all the Cursor Credits on this.

GFD….

My 2 cents. As a father of only daughters…

If we don’t weed out this sick behavior as a society we never will.

My thoughts are enough is enough.

Once the files are gone there is little to 0 chance they are ever public again….

You expect me to believe that a “oh shit we messed up” was accident?

It’s the perfect excuse… so no one looks at the files.

That’s my 2 cents.

All the zip files are gone on the DOJ website. The links are gone.

Does anyone have the OTHER data sets from before? Ive been lasered in on the DS1-DS12 but havent looked at the other documents at all

this is ridiculous. Good thing we got in when we did!

can you explain to me what is the problem exact ? its the dataset9 ? when i press the dataset9 link of the DOJ gov i see a download start with 180gb zip file in the browser. ?

It’s still here. No one dropped a complete dataset 9 yet tho…

Hasn’t moved AFAIK, just going slowly.

I’m getting errors for 1 and 8, all the rest went smooth.

I have been seeding all of the datasets since Sunday. The copy of set 9 has been the busiest, with set 10 a distant second. I plan on seeding them for quite a while yet, and also picking up a consolidated torrent when that becomes available. Hopefully you are able to get connected via the Swarm.

read the OP

I’m not sure of the exact files that were reported by the NYT, but there certainly were some concerning images in the initial Jan 30 release, however it was certainly more than the reported 40. I saw others as well but I don’t remember what the file numbers we’re.

spoiler

[246249_247010]

From my own observation timeline on the images in question: Jan 30: Images were accessible through DOJ directly. File numbers wereskipped in the list, but were manually reachable through URL. All these photos were fully unredacted (uncensored). **Feb 1: ** Images were NOT accessible through DOJ anymore, returns “Page not found”. However images were (and still are) snapshotted via web.archive.org. Feb 2: Downloading the 87GB Set 9 appeared contain these images as well, meaning we likely all have them on our computers. yikes

These files were scrubbed from the DOJ website, along with many others.

I found many of the scrubbed files by parsing through the lists and finding large gaps in file numbers, where the preceding file did not contain multiple images/documents in one pdf. There are also tons of internal memos in the dataset that precede file groups and talk about the content ahead. These memos surrounded files that seemed like they were meant to be redacted, so its worth poking around. I didn’t go nuts, but things I found around these that interesting and were also removed:

• [EFTA00276493]: internal memo referring to Clinton photographed with “nude Gretchen”.
• [EFTA00273790-EFTA276487]: (removed) looks like arial Lidar scans of the full estate?
• [EFTA00276220]: (removed) panoramic Infrared / xray-ray scan of a room

We didn’t have trouble getting Datasets 10, 11, or 12. I think Dataset 9 was probably delivered fine on Friday, so the NYTimes was able to grab a complete copy. Then, NYTimes started reporting the abusive material, which prompted the DOJ to yoink the ZIP, and it’s been screwy ever since.

I saw a post from a random Redditor confirming that they found abusive material, if that’s the concern. I doubt that the reports are fabricated, but I also agree that the reports are a great excuse for the DOJ to remove legitimate files.

I’m still waiting for just the first zip file to uncompress and it’s been HOURS. The ONLY reasonable explanation to bolster the NYT claim is that they put “AI” on the datasets running on a supercomputer, and “caught” the DOJ distributing CP! Show us the proof NYT! (redact faces and genitalia and show the images!) Then: CONVICT THEM ALL! LIFE IN PRISON FOR THE ENTIRE DOJ!!! ;-P

if what you’re saying is that CSAM seems like a very good excuse to redact a lot more of those files than they previously intended, I agree yes.

DOJ Epstein Files: I found what’s around those 3 missing files (Part 2)

Follow-up to my Dataset 9 indexing post. I pulled the adjacent files from my local copy of the torrent. What I found is… notable.

---

TLDR

The 3 missing files aren’t random corruption. They all cluster around one event: Epstein’s girlfriend Karyna Shuliak leaving St. Thomas (the island) in April 2016. And one of the gaps sits directly next to an email where Epstein recommends her a novel about a sympathetic pedophile—two days before the book was publicly released.

---

The Big Finding: Duplicate Processing Batches

Two of the missing files (326497 and 534391) are the same document processed twice—once with redactions, once without—208,000 files apart in the index.

Redacted Batch	Unredacted Batch	Content
326494-326496	534388-534390	AmEx travel booking, staff emails
326497 - MISSING	534391 - MISSING	???
326498-326500	—	Email chain continues
326501 - MISSING	—	???
326502-326506	—	Reply + Invoice
—	534392	Epstein personal email

Random file corruption hitting the same logical document in two separate processing runs, 208,000 positions apart? That’s not how corruption works. That’s how removal works.

---

What’s Actually In These Files

I pulled everything around the gaps. It’s all one email chain from April 10, 2016:

The event: Karyna Shuliak (Epstein’s girlfriend) booked on Delta flight from Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas → JFK on April 13, 2016.

St. Thomas is where you fly in/out to reach Little St. James. She was leaving the island.

The chain:

• 11:31 AM — AmEx Centurion (black card) sends confirmation to lesley.jee@gmail.com
• 11:33 AM — Lesley Groff (Epstein’s executive assistant) forwards to Shuliak, CC’s staff
• 11:35 AM — Shuliak replies “Thanks so much”
• 3:52 PM — Epstein personally emails Shuliak
• Next day — AmEx sends invoice

The unredacted batch (534xxx) reveals the email addresses that are blacked out in the redacted batch (326xxx):

• Lesley Groff: lesley.jee@gmail.com
• Ann Rodriquez: annrodriquez@yahoo.com
• Bella Klein: bklein575@gmail.com
• Karyna Shuliak: karynashuliak@icloud.com

---

The Epstein Email (EFTA00534392)

The document immediately after missing file 534391:

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: Karyna Shuliak
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:52:13 +0000

order http://softskull.com/dd-product/undone/

He’s telling her to buy a book. The same day she’s being booked to leave his island.

---

The Book

“Undone” by John Colapinto (Soft Skull Press)

On-sale date: April 12, 2016
Epstein’s email: April 10, 2016

He recommended it two days before public release.

Publisher’s description:

“Dez is a former lawyer and teacher—an ephebophile with a proclivity for teenage girls, hiding out in a trailer park with his latest conquest, Chloe. Having been in and out of courtrooms (and therapists’ offices) for a number of years, Dez is at odds with a society that persecutes him over his desires.”

The protagonist is a pedophile who resents society for judging him.

The author (John Colapinto) is a New Yorker staff writer, former Vanity Fair and Rolling Stone contributor. Exactly the media circles Epstein cultivated.

---

What’s Missing

So now we know the context:

• EFTA00326497 — Between AmEx confirmation and Groff’s forward. Probably the PDF ticket attachment referenced in the emails.

• EFTA00326501 — Between the forward chain and Shuliak’s reply. Unknown.

• EFTA00534391 — Immediately before Epstein’s personal email about the pedo book. Unknown, but its position is notable.

---

Open Questions

1. How did Epstein have this book before release? Advance copy? Knows the author?

2. What is 534391? It sits between staff logistics emails and Epstein’s direct correspondence. Another Epstein email? An attachment?

3. Are there other Shuliak travel records with similar gaps? Is April 2016 unique or part of a pattern?

4. What else is in the corpus from jeevacation@gmail.com?

---

Verify It Yourself

Try the DOJ links (all return errors):

• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00326497.pdf
• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00326501.pdf
• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00534391.pdf

Check the torrent: Pull the EFTA numbers I listed. Confirm the gaps. Confirm the adjacencies.

Grep the corpus: Search for “QWURMO” (booking reference), “Shuliak”, “jeevacation”, “Colapinto”

---

Summary

Three files missing from 531,256. All three cluster around one girlfriend’s April 2016 departure from St. Thomas. Same gaps appear in two processing batches 208,000 files apart. One gap sits adjacent to Epstein personally recommending a novel about a sympathetic pedophile, sent before the book was even publicly available.

This isn’t random corruption.

Full analysis + all code: https://github.com/degenai/Dataset9

---

If anyone has the torrent and wants to grep for Colapinto connections or other Shuliak trips, please do. This is open source for a reason.

ysk the page limit has been fixed, it caps out around 9600 for a total of ~197k file entries. Way less than the largest torrent’s 530k. Scraping now to get a list of the files they kept on the DOJ so we can determine which files they don’t want out there. Would be a good lead to further investigate the torrent

Just like I said… In NO way do I trust DOJ… Our only hope is if someone drops the full data set 9 somewhere.