• omarfw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    Nobody deserves insolvency more than Ubisoft. They are not just greedy. They’re also incompetent and delusional. They took solid gold franchises and fucked them to death.

  • PointyFluff@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 天前

    Meh. Their games are mediocre at best and the bullshit they attach to playing a game makes it totally not worth bothering to give Ubisoft any money.

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    2 天前

    Close another studio? Cancel some more games? That’s the best way to make more money, right? Lay everyone off and stop making products?

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      I do think they should actually downsize. Stop pushing out a new Assassins Creed every year or 2. Reduce the magnitude of the games a bit. First few Assassins Creeds were special. Far Cry games used to be great too. Now they just feel like a grindfest. As do the AC games.

      But I don’t think Ubisoft leadership would be capable of doing it right. They’d probably just lay off everyone who actually does work, and expect a similar amount of games.

    • greybeard@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 天前

      There are industries where that works. In business software, that’s incredibly common, in part because people buy the same software every year, or on a subscription. So the company makes a half decent product, hires an insane amount of people to market it while firing the vast majority of the developers, sells a ton of subscriptions, then coasts for a decade or two. Any time a competitor starts forming, buy them, lay off the staff, and coast on that too.

      It’s the business model of the vast majority of business to business software/service products out there.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 天前

        Cool, that sounds exactly like how people want game companies to run. Just make a subscription based game, fire a bunch of people that actually made the product, and kill any innovative competition!

        Doesn’t sound fucking deplorable at all.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        Any time a competitor starts forming, buy them, lay off the staff, and coast on that too.

        Hey! Don’t go calling Norton out like that, man

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 天前

      Those are good ideas, but their advisors will probably have them take out a massive loan and use it to buy another game studio, then lay off the staff at that game studio, to briefly appear profitable, before crashing into bankruptcy to be bought by Microsoft.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 天前

          Good point. But that’s no reason they can’t still waste a few million dollars on an aquisition to reduce competition in case they change their minds under their next CEO.

  • zippyhippynm@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 天前

    I hope Ubisoft goes belly up. Fuck them greedy dickheads. And special fuck you’s to the Trump family and the Saudis.

  • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 天前

    What do you say Lemmy, should we all put in $20 and make an acquisition offer? The people in this thread should cover it.

    • TomasEkeli@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 天前

      Current evaluation is about 720M USD I believe. At 20 USD per person, that implies there are 36M persons in this thread.

      Lemmy had gotten BIG!

  • iegod@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 天前

    They need some fun original IP, so much of their work is derivative and rehashes of old stuff now.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 天前

        O, I forgot about that. If it isn’t in Steam or Heroic, I apparently need active reminders it even exists.

          • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 天前

            You are correct. It’s the reason why I never played that anno 2070 game I bought, besides constant crashes when I tried to launch.

          • TyrianMollusk@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 天前

            Not only that, but true to Ubisoft form, many Uplay DRM games still require Steam if you buy them through Steam, so you actually must have both launchers running to play, not just Ubisoft’s. If you start it from Uplay (yeah, I know, it’s “Ubisoft Connect” now), it will start Steam up. Steam doesn’t require this–lots of Steam games don’t require Steam’s DRM. It’s completely Ubisoft’s choice to force Steam DRM on top of their own DRM.

            • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 天前

              People always seem to forget stream DRM is ENTIRELY optional and a developer choice.

              And beyond that 90% of the games people think use steam drm don’t actually use it. The only reason steam needs to run is because of the steam overlay. Remove the dll that hooks into steam for the overlay and the vast VASTY majority of all games on steam are entirely portable and drm free.

      • group_hug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 天前

        I noped out of the Outlaws demo when I was forced to create a Ubisoft account to play.

        Whole point of console gaming is convenience.

        They obviously don’t want my $60. I wonder how much they make selling the data to brokers that someone downloaded their demo and ditched it at the login screen.

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 天前

      The fact that they have shareholders means that they’re likely to keep rehashing old stuff.

      Shareholders love “guaranteed” money, which is why movie studios keep making the same crap over and over again. It’s more stable.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 天前

        Indeed, but whatever they’ve been doing over the past eight years doesn’t seem to be doing the stock prices any good. They need a reevaluation of their approach.

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 天前

      They also need to allow games to be more focused. Not every game needs to be an open world, crafter, rpg, treasure hunt.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      How you gonna make Rayman legends, one of the best 2d platformers ever and then just put all your focus on Assassin’s creed after that.

      • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 天前

        Rayman Legends is absolutely incredible. We just started our (I’d estimate) 13th run. That game is flawless and timeless.

      • 5oap10116@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        Its why their stock was so high and at least partially why theyve been suffering as of late. They’ve completely enshittified their portfolio and cant milk any more out of fed up users. They chose not to innovate content and instead found new ways to pump up numbers for short term shareholder returns.

        Im sure they haven’t learned and will only innovate more ways to enshittify themselves as that is their MO.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 天前

    The markets probably didn’t like all the cancelled games in the pipeline but a reset is probably for the best. Their main franchises have gotten steadily worst. I used to look forward to their games, now I don’t even buy them on special.

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 天前

      They said they want to focus on open world and live service games, so it sounds like the ones they canceled were the actual good ones.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 天前

        Tbh, they cancelled the prince of Persia remake. I don’t think we know what the other games were. I know it’s a popular franchise but I hate remakes, they always end up being a cash grab. Open world is kind of their bread and butter but it’s been mostly shit, so if they focus on the quality aspect, it might turn it around.

        I don’t really dig live service but r6 siege was one so maybe we can get another gem or two like it.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 天前

          They certainly can be cash grabs but I wouldn’t say always. Usually it’s the low effort remasters that don’t warrant rebuying at full price as they’re mostly a technical refresh (with mixed results based on how much they tried).

          Remake implies them remaking the game instead of upgrading it where you get things like the ffvii remakes or the upcoming dragon quest vii which looks pretty good. Sometimes they miss but I wouldn’t call them a cash grab as it still takes significant investment.

  • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 天前

    Ahh ubisoft. I have known you since the 90s with classics like B.A.T. 2 The Koshan Conspiracy (a game that still looks beautiful even if i still have no fucking idea what it is about!) And… well… I dont remember what else.

    Anyway, you suck now and you can die peacefully.