• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Prudes be prudes

    I don’t see this as an issue of prudes vs. non prudes, it’s a form of sexual assault.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think they’re just pointing out that politicians were okay with staying on Twitter after it became a nazi website, but the “grok porn” is the final nail in the coffin for them, it suggests that they consider sexual content to be worse than nazi content.

      Obviously having an AI generate porn of real people should be a crime, and probably already is, but the law is optional for corporations and billionaires.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        yeah, that’s valid, I can’t come up with any reason to separate the degrees of deplorableness of X - the nazi shit was repugnant enough for any outfit to leave - see NPR etc. and there’s no value add to it - it’s a cesspool and there’s so little to be gained, it’s inexcusable to use it at this point, much less rely on it.

        now that they’re making porn out of whatever the chuds want to prompt what the fuck over, like, learn to leave something behind

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I agree, but sadly, many politicians seemingly don’t agree. They’re happy to stay on the nazi website, because nazi shit is close enough to their actual beliefs that they aren’t turned off enough by it to leave.