There is no official support for Linux and I am pretty sure that the browser plugin is windows only. I liked the browser integration of KeePassXC but I will probably need to say goodbye to that feature as nothing else supports that on Linux. GNOME Secrets looks OK as an alternative.
There is an unofficial mono port available but it looks like ass and, since it also can’t do autofill in my browser, it has no benefits over GNOME Secrets.
That’s a funny thing to say. The communication channel between the browser and whatever external password store can be made as restricted as you like… keepassxc and its browser api let you restrict which credentials are offered to the browser, and can let you manually OK each request, for example. It doesn’t need unrestricted read access.
The bitwarden browser plugins are a bit more dubious though, because they communicate with a remote password store with more limited controls, and their enthusiasm for trying to store passkeys and totp hashes is definitely worth avoiding.
There is no official support for Linux and I am pretty sure that the browser plugin is windows only. I liked the browser integration of KeePassXC but I will probably need to say goodbye to that feature as nothing else supports that on Linux. GNOME Secrets looks OK as an alternative.
https://keepass.info/help/v2/setup.html#mono
It says it supports Linux now, though I admit I haven’t tried it yet
Pwsafe isn’t as sexy but it does the basic job - password safe.
Run it in wine
There is an unofficial mono port available but it looks like ass and, since it also can’t do autofill in my browser, it has no benefits over GNOME Secrets.
I’d never trust the browser to have direct access ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ i copy paste
That’s a funny thing to say. The communication channel between the browser and whatever external password store can be made as restricted as you like… keepassxc and its browser api let you restrict which credentials are offered to the browser, and can let you manually OK each request, for example. It doesn’t need unrestricted read access.
The bitwarden browser plugins are a bit more dubious though, because they communicate with a remote password store with more limited controls, and their enthusiasm for trying to store passkeys and totp hashes is definitely worth avoiding.