• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    which will make no obvious difference to what they need to do.

    It would make a whole lot of difference. But it’s like learning math, or basic finance indeed. Sooo useful, improves your life tremendously, yet most people can’t be bothered.

    Tragedy of the commons.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If they can use the internet in Windows and in Linux… How is there any real difference to the end user?

      They aren’t saying Linux doesn’t have advantages. They’re saying those differences don’t matter for what most people do.

      Another example, playing games. There’s no advantage in playing a game in Linux over Windows, or vice versa.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        How is there any real difference to the end user?

        For example many people can’t find their saved files anymore in windows, as it auto saves in some programs to onedrive. Yet some other programs can’t read from onedrive. That’s a real difference in usability. And ofcourse also in terms of invasion of privacy.

        For example, my mother became unable to read her email, as outlook changed UI completely and unavoidably. Had she chosen to use better software that would not have happened. A real difference.

        For example, when searching for a local program, microsoft now also serves ads in the search results. Many people fall for those ads, that also include scams. That’s a real problem you don’t have with better software.

        The examples keep on going on. And the end users do complain about them, often. They pay so much money for a worse experience.