I’m not sure how I landed here, so apologies if this is a repost. It’s quite worth the read. If anyone still believes the NYT is worth the paper it’s printed on, this is a great example of why it isn’t.

It’s remarkable, the people you’ll hear from. Teach for even a little while at an expensive institution—the term they tend to prefer is “elite”—and odds are that eventually someone who was a student there, who maybe resided only on the far periphery of your professional orbit, will become one or another kind of famous. At that point, out of the vast and silent ether, messages will come glowing into your inbox one after another. Do you remember this person? they will say. Was he your student? Did you work with him? We’re hoping for some insight—would it be possible for us to talk for a bit?

I taught at a place called Bowdoin College for 16 years, and during the last of those there was a student in attendance you’ve perhaps heard of. His name is Zohran Mamdani. And so, shortly after his startling, spirit-lifting victory in the primary last spring, the gentle flood of inquiries commenced. Word had gotten out not only that he went to Bowdoin—again, a very pricey, very wealthy, quite comprehensively the-thing-that-it-is small liberal arts college on the East Coast—but that, while there, he had majored in something called “Africana Studies.” You can probably see where this is going.

The first few messages wondered if I knew him (I don’t think I did, though I certainly had students who did, and do), if I taught him (possibly? but in truth not that I remembered), but mostly if I could say something about what he might have been reading and doing and studying, there in his time at this little college on the coast of Maine. More than once, the name “Frantz Fanon” was broached—which had the virtue of certain hand-showing clarity.

Emphasis mine. They started with framing that had to be met, no matter how wrong it was.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I… What? Is this response real? Do you genuinely think I’m equating Foucault and Hitler? Because I took issue with the dishonest arguments being made by the journalists that attempted to contact the author? And somehow you’re the one calling be obtuse.

    Seeing as you seem to have completely missed it, my point is that the powers that be are yet again senselessy cherry picking bad faith arguments, and it frustrates the hell out of me that “journalists” can do this shit in broad daylight and not be held accountable, let alone still pass as professionals. That does not mean that I endorse the arguments that engaging with Foucault, taking African Studies, or even reading Mein Kampf makes you unapologetically socialist, communist, a terrorist-sympathizer, an anti-semite, a nazi, or any of the other things one could willfully and ignorantly misconstrue from ones reading habits. I’ve made no attempt make such an argument, and your take on my comment is, honestly, completely unhinged. If anything, I’ve emphasized that to willfuly ignore Trump’s penchant for the nightly reading of fascist dictators while taking issue with someone who did a given course in university is absurdly dishonest. Why you felt the need to agree with me so aggressively while also painting my opinion as something it is not is just beyond me.

    Nuance is absolutely a thing, and it seems quite lost on you.