For those unfamiliar with wikipedia processes, tldr talk pages are where discussion about articles happens. See Help:Talk pages for details.
Link goes to the talk page as of the currently-latest edit by Jimbo; here is the diff showing other edits to it since then.
see also:
- the current latest version of the article itself, as of today (last edit was four days ago): https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaza_genocide&oldid=1319572343
- all edits by Jimbo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jimbo_Wales
Removed by mod
Take this Holocaust denial apologia and fuck off.
I appreciate you taking time to reply!
Fuck off, holocaust denier
Removed by mod
All ethical systems rely on example applications. Israel’s morality can not be measured by any moral system. Rather, it’s actions are so abhorrent, that any moral systems merit will in the future be measured by whether it judges Israel’s actions as bad.
Ethics shouldn’t be used in this context in the first place, because ethics is about defining what’s good and what’s bad for you and not about trying to apprehend the manifoldness of things
What a fucking stupid thing to say
deleted by creator
Value judgements? Genocide is an objective thing. It’s clearly defined, with zero “good vs evil” involved in its definition.
It is clearly defined, but deciding what fits that definition and what doesn’t is not at all objective, it totally depends on which side you’re on. And since accusing somebody of something implies you’re yourself innocent, accusing of genocide is saying “they bad we good”, thus dehumanizing “them” as irrational “bad” and rejecting the attempt to understand the conflict in its entirety and in its controversial nature.
Apart from the fact that virtually every genocide expert has declared this a genocide. Including those from Israel.
Genocide is bad, genocide denialism and apologia is bad. Fuck off
I mean, genocide is pretty objectively bad.