Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1445
arrow-up1445imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·6 months agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·6 months agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-26 months agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.