• MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know, and it’s fucking scary…

    Just today I saw this post on Mastodon, and cannot fathom how they’ll want to run entire apps flawlessly inside LLMs, and at what ecological cost!?

      • notabot@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        At a guess, when people ask it to “sum the numbers above”, they usually test it on the sequence 1,2,3,4,5. It’s an LLM, it’s doesn’t process its input, it returns one of the most probable tokens based on what it’s seen before. If it actually becomes a “thing”, crashing the global economy is the least of our worries.

      • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Easy. You got 1 and 2, which is obviously 12. Then you add 3, because it is a sum, so 15 comes out. Don’t forget to like and subscribe!

        • e0qdk@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Almost works in JS. +("1" + 2) + 3 is 15, and "1" + 2 - -3 is 15, but "1" + 2 + 3 is “123”. 🙄️

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m still not convinced Javascript is a serious language rather than a prank.

      • retrolasered@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its added 4 and 5 also. I think its solving a trianguar number pattern: n(n+1)/2. These things are in maths tests all the time where you need to find the next two in the sequence

      • Part4@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        1,2,3 … 12 is twelve + 3 = 15.

        ‘AI’ has done some really good stuff, but it has to be shepherded really tightly if it is going to be any actual use.

        It isn’t clever enough to be this huge machine that takes everybody’s jobs and does everything - which is what the likes of Altman said for quite a long time. It can’t be accurate enough. So now they are looking for other ways to monetise what they have achieved, which, imvho, is enabling natural language communication between a human and a computer.

    • retrolasered@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Im curious if a =COPILOT formula gives the same results on that sheet today as it would next year after the LLM has changed with the extra input. Will it reassess that every time the sheet is opened and there is an internet connection?