Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoobserves your slitquokk.auimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1519
arrow-up1519imageobserves your slitquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squaresbird@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 month agotop is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squareLOGIC💣@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoOh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoDon’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThough as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoDo you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoHuh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Don’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.