• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’ve had this conversation several times.

    Also the variant that’s like

    Them: “the companies will compete”

    Me: “what if they decide to form a cartel or whatever instead of competing?”

    Them: “that’s illegal”

    Me: “says who? How?”

    • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 days ago

      They don’t even need to form a cartel! One company puts sawdust in their rice krispies, another puts arsenic in, another puts the blood of orphans in. You pick the sawdust one. The “free market” has decided sawdust belongs in rice krispies.

      But what if another compa - no there’s rat shit in those.

      The market choice ideology only works if there’s an infinite variety of products covering every possible combination of traits. And even then, it requires somehow people can find the one they want through all of that (infinite time and information I guess).

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        The irony of libertarianism is that it requires each individual consumer to have more knowledge of consumer products than the government, who for some reason can not have enough information to run the economy. I think they just assume that bad outcomes are fine and it’s trying to get good outcomes that is the sin.