• addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      980 m/s muzzle velocity on that thing, so that’s at least 4 seconds of gravity and wind interference accounted for in the aim. Bordering on the supernatural.

        • chrizzowski@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t think the round itself was guided, rather the sniper was guided by visuals and data from the drone. Even more impressive if it was a good ol’ analog shot apart from help where to point it.

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            According to the article it was a “14.5 mm Aligator sniper rifle”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipex_Alligator

            Which just takes big ass bullets yeah

            guided by artificial intelligence working in tandem with a drone reconnaissance complex

            Im no gun guy, but i would assume it was probably nothing “AI” related (as usual when people use the term AI) and just a smart algorithm that takes in all the parameters gathered by the drone and spotter and calculates the correct parameters to use for the operator.

            • 8uurg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Arguably, a smart algorithm that determines parameters is some form of AI, just not an LLM, image generator or other machine learning model.

              • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 days ago

                The term AI is so worthless to begin with because it has no real definition. I would personally say that its “anything involving machine learning” but that defintion doesnt actually have anything to do with being “artificially intelligent” so it also makes no sense.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  “Anything involving machine learning” also has nothing to do with “classical AI,” which was basically just gigantic piles of if statements.

                • 8uurg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  It does have a dictionary entry though, e.g. "the branch of computer science that deal with writing computer programs that can solve problems creatively”, and I would argue that this definition fits.

                  The definition “something that lets a computer perform tasks that are thought to require intelligence” depends on the person, and whether they think something required a form of intelligence. Accounting for all variables over a large distance so you hit your target seems like it requires a reasonable amount of intelligence to me.

                  It is a extremely generic term though, almost like using ‘software package’. It is more often used as a buzzword than something that provides significant clarification about how it works.