Carcharodonna [she/her]@hexbear.net to askchapo@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-220 days agoHas anyone else here heard of this (betanet)? It appears to be some kind of censorship-resistant net protocol. What are your thoughts on it?github.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up137
arrow-up137external-linkHas anyone else here heard of this (betanet)? It appears to be some kind of censorship-resistant net protocol. What are your thoughts on it?github.comCarcharodonna [she/her]@hexbear.net to askchapo@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-220 days agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoI know theres some experimental machines out there in like universities and stuff, but aren’t they still just poking around with like a singular q-bit before it decays again?
minus-squareheatenconsumerist [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 days ago“Fastest” private machines are >1000 at the moment. NSA/CIA “gave up” trying to crack sha2 with a quantum machine in/before 2016. They already exist, this is already a “post-qunatum” environment.
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agohuh so are these things just not as effective as was hypothesized, or do researchers still not really know how to use them? A little of both?
I know theres some experimental machines out there in like universities and stuff, but aren’t they still just poking around with like a singular q-bit before it decays again?
“Fastest” private machines are >1000 at the moment. NSA/CIA “gave up” trying to crack sha2 with a quantum machine in/before 2016.
They already exist, this is already a “post-qunatum” environment.
huh
so are these things just not as effective as was hypothesized, or do researchers still not really know how to use them? A little of both?