cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34045100

still deciding to fully degoogle with GOS or muddling through with what I have (proprietary, data grabbing and bloated).

To understand the question, compare with my main hardware with debian on it: a regular notebook I bought in 2016 and I’ve used heavily for all kinds of stuff: working, writing papers, downloading and playing media including AV1, editing audio, torrenting…

One of the best investments I ever made, considering what I paid and how prices nowadays are. Debian offers regular upgrades and I don’t have to check if my hardware is going to support the software on a level comparable with android devices (GOS only runs on pixels, other open-source, privacy focused Android operating systems have similar hardware restrictions).

I want this kind of ROI for the device I buy and the software I use, but I don’t know if that’s possible:

GOS drops support for older pixels but I don’t know how many years any particular device is supported by GOS: 3 years? not enough. There’s no way I’m buying a new pixel every 3 years. I’d even consider 6 years restrictive.

  • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If the applications lag to the point where you can’t stand it, you’re going to need a new phone anyway and for most people who use social media applications like WhatsApp etc., the performance of the phone goes outdated much sooner than the support of the OS.

  • Eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Pixel 8A you can get probably very affordable now and will get updates until 2031. It’s more likely that by that time you will have dropped your phone and break it or simply want a hardware upgrade.

    It also supports playing AV1 in hardware even at 4k resolution.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I just ordered an 8a because of how affordable it is used on eBay (~$250USD) and specifically for long support time it still has. Probably the best bang for your buck version

      • jerb@lemmy.croc.pw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Android development isn’t closed. The Pixels no longer have public device trees provided by Google, but no other device manufacturer did that either. It was a nice to have, but Graphene still got a fully functional Android 16 build out without them within a few weeks, and the device trees aren’t why they build for Pixels, it’s the security features.

    • flatbield@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is the answer. GrapheneOS still needs the binary blob updates from Google or probably more correctly Googles suppliers.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I can only share experience with Sailfish OS: As long as you don’t drop your phone, it will easily last five years and might last eight. It depends of course as well how much you use some of the cancer that the modetn web is. Looking up the Arch Wiki requires a lot less ressources than browsing LinkedIn.

    • unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      By 8 years old even the newest devices will be out of software support and using EOL phones is not a particularly great idea for security. GOS’s security focus goes out the window if you use an old version with known vulnerabilities.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Sailfish OS has very long support times and the licenses I got so far are without time limit. IIRC that has changed or might change but still significantly longer than any vendor Android.

          • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            firmware updates matter and depend mostly on the chip manufacturer’s support.

            Can you give examples for this?

            The deeper problem is that the OS Vendors for phones are already adversial. They want to extract as much pesonal data as possible. IMO, that is not really better than having malware on one’s phone.