I also don’t have a convenient, and actually useful AI device that knows everything about every animal that I keep on me at all times. Something close to it, but it’s wrong 70% of the time.
There’s also only 1025 pokemon. There are so, so, so many more animals IRL to memorize.
Speaking of AI, the app whoBIRD (kind of a FOSS BirdNET alternative) allows the recognition of bird species by sound. Obviously, it’s not perfect and not all birds sing, but it’s the closest IRL to Pokémon calling their names and a Pokédex.
If this was in 2002, there were also only 251 or 386 Pokemon depending on when in the year it was done (Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire released in November 2002)
Not to mention a huge chunk of those Pokemon at that time were just evolution phases, sharing very similar names as their base (e.g. Charmander, Charmeleon, and then Charizard). Additionally, each evolution phase looks pretty similar to the prior. That in comparison to, say, many different varieties of ants, wasps, birds, etc. that don’t look that different at a distance, especially to an 8-year-old.
Don’t forget the mimic species that evolution selected for because they look like something else. Even the most complex video game is nothing compared to nature’s complexity. I’d love to learn about geology, but look at how many variations there are in just one group of minerals. Biochemistry is the real misleading one - “I’m just a few types of atoms” Yeah, in a shitload of combinations.
And all pokemon of a species usually look the same! Very few gendered traits, age differences (unless you count evolution, and that still counts for more species in pokemon than irl), season differences, plain old individual differences, etc.
I also don’t have a convenient, and actually useful AI device that knows everything about every animal that I keep on me at all times. Something close to it, but it’s wrong 70% of the time.
There’s also only 1025 pokemon. There are so, so, so many more animals IRL to memorize.
Speaking of AI, the app whoBIRD (kind of a FOSS BirdNET alternative) allows the recognition of bird species by sound. Obviously, it’s not perfect and not all birds sing, but it’s the closest IRL to Pokémon calling their names and a Pokédex.
If this was in 2002, there were also only 251 or 386 Pokemon depending on when in the year it was done (Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire released in November 2002)
Not to mention a huge chunk of those Pokemon at that time were just evolution phases, sharing very similar names as their base (e.g. Charmander, Charmeleon, and then Charizard). Additionally, each evolution phase looks pretty similar to the prior. That in comparison to, say, many different varieties of ants, wasps, birds, etc. that don’t look that different at a distance, especially to an 8-year-old.
Don’t forget the mimic species that evolution selected for because they look like something else. Even the most complex video game is nothing compared to nature’s complexity. I’d love to learn about geology, but look at how many variations there are in just one group of minerals. Biochemistry is the real misleading one - “I’m just a few types of atoms” Yeah, in a shitload of combinations.
And all pokemon of a species usually look the same! Very few gendered traits, age differences (unless you count evolution, and that still counts for more species in pokemon than irl), season differences, plain old individual differences, etc.