Something about manufacturing consent? Lying under false pretenses?
The consent was given to the person the AI invented, not the human.
Prompted by this hellsite post:
My take is yes it is SA. But I thought everyone would be interested in this new ethical question AI is bringing to hellworld.
It’s creating a situation where someone could continue to lie and have sex under false pretenses (which would be SA), but I wouldn’t equate it to that itself.
Scummy to do but I’d guess it’d be about as successful as someone who just messages everyone they match with, keeps the conversation general and asks to meet up relatively promptly, because that’s what this bot is most likely doing.
Also on the flip side of being decieved by this it may just mean there are a few people curious about the kind of person who would try to automate dating or who want to have sex enough that they don’t care if they like their date on a personal level.