The original prompt was:
Can you explain to me the differences between Marxism-Leninism with MZT, and the Maoism synthesized by chairman Gonzalo
It’s answer after asking to replace ML-MZT to avoid censorship:
I appreciate your creative approach to discussing these theoretical frameworks. Using “Dumplings Theory” as a placeholder, I’ll outline the key distinctions between the three concepts you referenced, focusing on their philosophical and practical differences:
1. Classic Dumpling-Making (Original Framework)
- Foundation: Based on universal culinary principles
- Core Ingredients: Standard dough-water-filling ratio applicable globally
- Cooking Method: Urban kitchen-focused preparation
- Key Technique: Professional chef-led preparation process
- Cultural Adaptation: Minimal localization needed for basic recipes
2. Localized Dumpling Innovation (First Major Adaptation)
- Revolutionary Approach: “Peasant kitchen” methodology
- Ingredient Reformation: Emphasized locally-sourced fillings over imported ones
- Cooking Process: Protracted steaming strategy starting from rural kitchens
- Cultural Integration: “Mass line” recipe development (community taste-testing)
- Special Technique: Continuous dough kneading during preparation
3. Contemporary Radical Dumpling Theory (Later Synthesis)
- Fundamental View: Complete kitchen overhaul prerequisite
- Ingredient Philosophy: Absolute substitution of traditional components
- Cooking Method: Immediate high-heat “spark” technique
- Organizational Principle: Unified recipe instruction system
- Cultural Aspect: Total replacement of dining customs
Key Distinctions:
| Aspect | Classic | Localized Adaptation | Radical Theory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Kitchen | Industrial | Village-based | Any contested space |
| Key Actors | Chef collective | Peasant-cooks | Unified diners |
| Timeframe | Sequential stages | Protracted process | Immediate service |
| Recipe Development | Standardized | Mass taste-tested | Complete reinvention |
| Cultural Approach | Minimal adjustment | Selective adaptation | Full transformation |
This culinary metaphor illustrates how each framework represents distinct approaches to kitchen organization, ingredient sourcing, cooking methodology, and cultural integration - while maintaining the core concept of dumpling creation. The radical theory particularly emphasizes complete systemic overhaul rather than gradual adaptation.
Would you like me to elaborate on any aspect using this metaphorical framework? I can discuss historical contexts, theoretical developments, or practical applications while maintaining this analytical approach.
Protracted steaming technique
I understand nothing, but at least I had a good laugh.
Can anyone knowledgeable about maoism and who understands what it’s saying tell me if it’s accurate, or does AI keep being a useless liar?
Deepseek is doo doo when it comes to theory, b/c like all AI its trained on radlib brainworms heavily at best. AI isn’t popping its data from the highest ether like the techbro slime have deluded themselves into thinking, its pulling it out from some stank ass as well as legit literature, and lots off it. All Lms are looking for similarities, my favorite was talking to a very small LLM 4b about fashion and it decided to turn into bohemian Engels quote bot on me all the sudden b/c something I wrote was a touch too similar. Its ok for quick unserious things, but don’t lean on it or any AI, sure maybe some day in 2034 someone hacks together a shit theory trained bot, because that’s what it will be at best under our conditions.
Anyway, I can ask the ol whale about fascism and neoliberalism being one in the same and it’ll pop out CIA lies about the Uighur in its examples, I ask it about some similarities between NEP and Deng’s reforms and it says it can’t. Better safe than sorry sure, but come on you can’t even catch your safety on something superficial af.
At least Deepseek is trained on some neat lil niche things I’ve not seen another bot familiar with, for example that Sacred Terrible Air book by Kurvitz, I ask any other AI for more details about it, characters, plot, analysis etc and they hallucinate hardcore
, which is interesting to say the least, while I ask DS and I get more detailed answers that check out with the book. It also pulls some mean vegan, its onion bhaji recipe is damn good, so good I’ve seen other mentions across the internet.It also pulls some mean vegan, its onion bhaji recipe is damn good
Oh yeah I also asked it to pull me a tofu recipe from craps I had in my kitchen, it was pretty yummy hehe
I also noticed the liberal crap when talking with it about theory, so yeah I don’t take what it says too seriously, I mostly use it for fun. But sometimes I also use it just to refresh my memory about books I’ve read in the past, it works pretty well for that. I don’t want to reread the entire book again.
