Are you playing dumb or just not getting it? I asked you to show me an individual making the claims who has not been paid to do so. You linked to a fuckin podcast, instead of providing a name. I am once again asking for the name of the individual making the claim. This should be extremely easy for you if you’re not just making shit up and wishcasting.
Then provide some reliable sources and prove me wrong. Podcasts are shit and the two of them are sisters, which makes it one source. I found an article talking about their fashion brand and some of their “persecution” and it’s a load of nonsense which doesn’t fall within the realm of genocide.
What happened was they embellished some vague childhood memories in order to boost their brand.
the uyghurs in the podcast are not being paid for their interviews.
Yes that would be how it usually works, the “journalist” can therefore pretend to not know the individual they are interviewing has a stipend to do their speaking tour, paid for by the NED or some other CIA/State Department appendage.
There’s Nigara, who lives in Istanbul and whose spoken Chinese is probably equivalent to that of a kindergartener and speaks more Turkish than Uyghur. I didn’t listen to the rest of the podcast cos I’m sleepy
So you’re scared of anybody being able to check up on your claims and won’t provide an actual full name of someone making these claims to prevent anybody from being able to investigate the individual. You’re gonna need to work on your tactics because this is pretty pathetic, but if you keep it up I am sure somebody at USAID would take a look at your resume once their budget has been sorted out again.
the uyghur?
do you want any uyghur name?
Are you playing dumb or just not getting it? I asked you to show me an individual making the claims who has not been paid to do so. You linked to a fuckin podcast, instead of providing a name. I am once again asking for the name of the individual making the claim. This should be extremely easy for you if you’re not just making shit up and wishcasting.
the uyghurs in the podcast are not being paid for their interviews.
yes, their names are simple to type. Nigara and kewser are interviewed in part 1.
Lmao, you look up those names and it just links it back to the one podcast. Get better sources mate.
that’s where the names are from.
those are the people being interviewed.
That’s why they used their names.
A single shit podcast and two names and that’s all you have to show as evidence for genocide?
nope, none of your comment seems correct.
Then provide some reliable sources and prove me wrong. Podcasts are shit and the two of them are sisters, which makes it one source. I found an article talking about their fashion brand and some of their “persecution” and it’s a load of nonsense which doesn’t fall within the realm of genocide.
What happened was they embellished some vague childhood memories in order to boost their brand.
your opinion of podcasts doesn’t make firsthand sources unreliable.
'boost their brand"
the uyghurs?
Seems correct to me.
You don’t have full names?
Yes that would be how it usually works, the “journalist” can therefore pretend to not know the individual they are interviewing has a stipend to do their speaking tour, paid for by the NED or some other CIA/State Department appendage.
There’s Nigara, who lives in Istanbul and whose spoken Chinese is probably equivalent to that of a kindergartener and speaks more Turkish than Uyghur. I didn’t listen to the rest of the podcast cos I’m sleepy
me? what are you talking about?
So you’re scared of anybody being able to check up on your claims and won’t provide an actual full name of someone making these claims to prevent anybody from being able to investigate the individual. You’re gonna need to work on your tactics because this is pretty pathetic, but if you keep it up I am sure somebody at USAID would take a look at your resume once their budget has been sorted out again.
I provided links so that you could specifically check the verified sources.
you linked to podcasts you clown
Yes, two of the sources are direct interviews with multiple uyghurs, as you requested.
I don’t see how anyone can see you being deliberately evasive like this and not conclude that your claims are bullshit.
providing sources and answering questions is not evasive.
Yes, if you had done that, it would not have been evasive. Instead you have been evasive
I find facts and sources very direct, so I provide facts and sources.
You haven’t yet.