• irmoz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Let’s rewind to before that desperate (and likely spontaneous) accusation, and I’ll give you another chance to reply in a normal manner.

      No deflection. Just admit you didn’t know LLMs scrape social media. That’s all. It’s okay; we don’t come into this world with all of its knowledge.

      • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I actually did have a vague idea in that general direction.

        But that’s rather beside my point. I mean, the AI definitely offered these answers. The answers are definitely gender biased. Offering that it’s merely an artifact of the LLM technology is definitely a terrible excuse for that.

        And given that LLMs are well known to be tweaked to align better with the philosophical styles of the hour, doubly so.

        • irmoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          So, once again, you double down. No, you obviously didn’t know that, and clearly still don’t actually understand it, since you’re claiming it was engineered to push a narrative (what narrative you won’t say, but i bet it rhymes with bliss gandry).

          Lastly, it’s not an “excuse”. It’s an explanation. Calling it an “excuse” is just another attempt to deflect the answer and avoid being wrong.

          • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well given that the bias is generally considered a bad thing, explanations absolving them of responsibility for the badness are what is generally called an “excuse”.