fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前check it before you wreck itmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1907
arrow-up1907external-linkcheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square42fedilink
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-21 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前I agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.