fossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1907
arrow-up1907external-linkcheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.