fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1907
arrow-up1907external-linkcheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.