You plead not guilty because they have to prove you did it beyond a reasonable doubt. If they messed with the evidence (it looks like they did) then that evidence will be inadmissable. Plus the jury could still find him not guilty.
This is one thing I’ve slowly been agreeing with France on: the name of someone accused of a crime is not released publicly unless and until they are convicted. There is a huge propensity for “the court of public opinion” to convict someone just because police arrested them.
You plead not guilty because they have to prove you did it beyond a reasonable doubt. If they messed with the evidence (it looks like they did) then that evidence will be inadmissable. Plus the jury could still find him not guilty.
deleted by creator
This is one thing I’ve slowly been agreeing with France on: the name of someone accused of a crime is not released publicly unless and until they are convicted. There is a huge propensity for “the court of public opinion” to convict someone just because police arrested them.
deleted by creator
“the regime”
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/regime
deleted by creator
Who is “thier daddy”?
Do you even know what you’re talking about when you string your nonsense together?
deleted by creator
Yes you are
deleted by creator
What?
deleted by creator
What do you mean by this? I thought only NY state got to take a whack at him? Is some other court claiming they get to try him too?
deleted by creator
Wow, thats some bullshit.
deleted by creator