cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 8 个月前Let's not jump to conclusionslemmy.mlimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up11.75Kcross-posted to: thisisnotmylife@lemm.eecomics@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.75KimageLet's not jump to conclusionslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 8 个月前message-square167fedilinkcross-posted to: thisisnotmylife@lemm.eecomics@lemmy.ml
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 个月前It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 个月前You asked “Am wrong?”. The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 个月前Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them. Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.
It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
You asked “Am wrong?”.
The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.
Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.
Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.