Godric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前The questions that keep you up at nightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1524
arrow-up1524imageThe questions that keep you up at nightlemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square32fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 年前It’s far from obvious I’d bisect the neck
minus-squaresimple@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 年前No way, I’d go for A. Wouldn’t want that long neck wriggling about after the cut.
minus-squaresanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 年前Why not just use two guillotines so you can do a and b. Best of both worlds.
minus-squareenkers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 年前Who the heck has the budget for 2 guillotines?? It’s clearly B. If you ever needed to put that head on a pike to send a message, you wouldn’t want to carry that big neck around.
I’d go with B for obvious reasons
It’s far from obvious
I’d bisect the neck
On which axis?
The good one
The evil one
No way, I’d go for A. Wouldn’t want that long neck wriggling about after the cut.
Why not just use two guillotines so you can do a and b. Best of both worlds.
Who the heck has the budget for 2 guillotines??
It’s clearly B. If you ever needed to put that head on a pike to send a message, you wouldn’t want to carry that big neck around.
Thats a very convincing argument
Exactly what I thought about
Just nip the tip!