Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 个月前Home Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1911
arrow-up1911imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 个月前message-square124fedilink
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 个月前The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 个月前Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 个月前Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.