🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1705
arrow-up1705imageAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoEveryone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
minus-squarengwoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoModern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoHow do they account for side fumbling?
minus-squareBowtiesAreCool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWell they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
minus-squaredodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this. Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?
Everyone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
Modern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
How do they account for side fumbling?
Well they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
I’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this.
Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?