tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.netimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1524
arrow-up1524imageI like both, but usually prefer Ubuntuslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBut if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
minus-squarelengau@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoFlatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.
So why would Canonical switch to another technology that came after what they made and doesn’t cover their biggest use cases for snaps?
Removed by mod
But if flatpak doesn’t meet the widest use case of snap, are they really describing flatpak?
Removed by mod
Flatpak is not a solution for packaging a large portion of the types of software Canonical packages with snap, such as database servers, kernels and containerisation software like lxd.