renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up11.26Kcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.26KimageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 年前XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Too redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareDr. Bluefall@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Unironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.