Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoCome and take itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square250fedilinkarrow-up11.14K
arrow-up11.14KimageCome and take itlemmy.worldSubstance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square250fedilink
minus-squarecurbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoIn the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army. As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
minus-squareTb0n3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
In the context of the time period, it was a replacement for a standing army.
As we have one, then obviously that amendment no longer has any meaning then? So we should just remove it. Cool.
I’m more for disbanding the standing military than disarming the citizenry.
Why not both?
Removed by mod